signalsmatrix.com

PFAS Class-Action Thinx Period Underwear Lawsuit Settled for $5

4.7 (621) · $ 10.99 · In stock

Consumers of Thinx period underwear may get a refund following a class-action lawsuit settlement surrounding the use of “forever chemicals.”

The New York Times on X: The period underwear brand Thinx made public that it reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit claiming its products contain harmful chemicals, known as PFAS

$1.4M Knix Period Underwear Class Action Settlement

Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post

Thinx to pay up to $5 million to settle claims its period underwear contained potentially harmful chemicals

Thinx will cut 95 workers by May 1 following $5M class-action settlement

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

Thinx Settles Class-Action Lawsuit: Here's What You Need To Know About PFAS, Nation

Thinx Settles PFAS Class Action Lawsuit for $4M While Knix Fights Back

Thinx period underwear settles class action lawsuit over possibly causing fertility issues

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR