4.7 (621) · $ 10.99 · In stock
Consumers of Thinx period underwear may get a refund following a class-action lawsuit settlement surrounding the use of “forever chemicals.”
The New York Times on X: The period underwear brand Thinx made public that it reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit claiming its products contain harmful chemicals, known as PFAS
$1.4M Knix Period Underwear Class Action Settlement
Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post
Thinx to pay up to $5 million to settle claims its period underwear contained potentially harmful chemicals
Thinx will cut 95 workers by May 1 following $5M class-action settlement
Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS
Thinx Settles Class-Action Lawsuit: Here's What You Need To Know About PFAS, Nation
Thinx Settles PFAS Class Action Lawsuit for $4M While Knix Fights Back
Thinx period underwear settles class action lawsuit over possibly causing fertility issues
Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS
Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR